Passa ai contenuti principali

$5.6 Trillion Fund Manager Warns Stocks Face "Significant" Risk Of Double-Digit Pullback In 2020

The head of investment strategy for one of the largest piles of investor capital in the world believes stocks face a "greater-than-usual" risk of a sizable pullback during 2020. Joseph Davis, the head of investment strategy at Vanguard, one of the largest asset-management companies in the world and the progenitor of passive investing, said he sees a "50% chance" of a correction - that is, a drop of 10% or more from the highs - next year. 

While some joked about Davis's "coin flipper" odds...

...he explained that during more typical years, the odds of such a pullback are only 30%, and that stocks have a greater than usual chance of a double-digit pullback next year. We haven't seen a correction since, well, late last year, when stocks came a hair's breadth away from entering a bear market during the closing days of the year, culminating with one of the worst Christmas Eve sessions on record.

Joseph Adinolfi

But fears that the market chaos was only just beginning turned out to be unwarranted, as markets mostly powered higher during 2019. Investors' big mistake, according to Davis, was that they were too pessimistic. During the coming year, Davis believes investors are going to make the mistake of being too optimistic.

"Financial markets run the risk of getting ahead of themselves,"Joseph Davis, who also serves as Vanguard's chief economist, said in an interview Friday. He sees 50% odds on a correction in 2020, against what he terms a more typical figure of about 30%.

According to Davis, at current valuations, risk assets are pricing in 3% economic growth during the coming year, something he sees as unlikely.

Though most of Vanguard's $5.6 trillion AUM is tied up in passive funds, the investment chief insisted that investors shouldn't write him off, even if other more visible investing luminaries, like Stanley Druckenmiller, are warming up to risk once again.

But as Davis sees it, the market is already richly valued, making it difficult to justify further upside.

"Across the board, expected returns for most strategies are below trailing three-year returns," said Davis. The investment chief for the $5.6 trillion asset manager - known more for its passive, index-tracking offerings - estimates that risk assets are pricing in close to 3% U.S. economic growth, an outcome he sees as unlikely.

Even on Davis's own private models, he says US stocks have broken out onto the expensive side of fairly valued. Estimated P/E, meanwhile, is on the higher end of its historical range. 

Remember when WSJ outed BridgewaterAssociates for reportedly opening a $1 billion derivatives position that would pay off massively if stocks tank during the first quarter?

Dalio swiftly denied the report, suggesting that if Bridgewater did have a $1 billion notional options position open, it was likely part of the firm's hedging strategy.

This and other measures like the skew suggest that investors are trying to accomplish two objectives as move into 2020: They want to hold on to their positions so they don't miss out on any gains, while buying enough protection to ensure that when the next big pullback finally comes, they're ready. 

According to most measures he uses, stocks are already overly valued,

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial...

Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire - Bloomberg

Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-06/charting-the-world-economy-the-u-s-jobs-market-is-on-fire Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire Zoe Schneeweiss Explore what's moving the global economy in the new season of the Stephanomics podcast. Subscribe via  Apple Podcast , Spotify or  Pocket Cast . The last U.S. payrolls report of the decade was a doozy, beating expectations and doing its bit to keep the consumer in good health heading into 2020. That's good news given the various pressures still weighing on global growth. Here's some of the charts that appeared on Bloomberg this week, offering a pictorial insight into the latest developments in the global economy. U.S. Advertisement Scroll to continue with content ...

The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time | Seeking Alpha

The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time | Seeking Alpha The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time Apr. 23, 2019 8:41 AM ET Historically, an inverted yield curve has invariably led to a recession. We are currently experiencing an inverted yield curve. We have two reasons for the current inverted yield curve: the central banks irrationally raising short-term interest rates and investors expect a recession because of the extended boom period. The two reasons are not enough to lead to a recession, and other structural changes in the economy are pointing to a boom rather than a recession. Investors can capitalize on the current situation if they believe that the inverted yield cure would not lead to a recession. Summary and Paper Thesis Although an inverted yield curve led to a recession almost without exception in the last 50 years within a relatively short period of time after the inversion happened, this pap...