Passa ai contenuti principali

Stock Volatility Isn't Dead. It's Just Got Freakish and Extreme - Bloomberg

Stock Volatility Isn't Dead. It's Just Got Freakish and Extreme - Bloomberg

Stock Volatility Isn't Dead. It's Just Got Freakish and Extreme
  • HSBC, Goldman Sachs warn on vol-of-vol risk amid illiquidity

  • Beneath the calm in global stocks lies a brittle market prone to violent spasms.

    As central banks snuff out market fears for now and the brewing melt-up banishes memories of last year's meltdown, the threat of brief but extreme price swings looms over fast-money traders.

    In financial parlance, gap risk -- sudden moves with little trading in between -- is growing, according to HSBC Holdings Plc.

    Blame robots and electronic market-makers for creating an illusion of liquidity that can vanish on a dime. Post-crisis regulation, or the boom in volatility-sensitive investing.

    Whatever the reason, the likes of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. warn hot-money flows from systematic traders may awaken volatility from its slumber, as hedge funds double down on bets the tranquility will endure.

    Brief but instense volatility spikes have increased since '08: HSBC

    "Volatility has become more volatile," Mark Spitznagel, founder of hedge fund Universa Investments LP, said in an interview in London. "It's incredible that after what happened in February 2018 and in the fourth quarter, so soon after that we're hitting new lows in implied volatility."

    Limited macro threats thanks to dovish central banks and stable inflation expectations are capping lasting volatility for now. But it's an unstable peace, as convulsions like last February and December laid bare.

    It's all feeding into fears that the hot money could beat a retreat in an unloved rally bereft of buy-and-hold flows. And it's a big risk for volatility sellers, in particular those with a propensity for levered bets with muted hedging.

    relates to Stock Volatility Isn't Dead. It's Just Got Freakish and Extreme

    As realized vol declines and equities trend higher, the stars are aligning for systematic traders to add more money to stocks -- potentially raising the risk of a volatility event if sentiment suddenly swings.

    A Nomura Holdings Inc. model shows commodity-trading advisers and algos are scooping up equities, while volatility-targeting funds are risk-on.

    Goldman Sachs, for one, gives reason for caution.

    "Vol of vol is likely to remain high as procyclical investors such as CTAs, vol target and risk parity as well as option hedging have again been a key driver of demand for risky assets year-to-date," strategists led by Christian Mueller-Glissmann wrote in a note this week. "A trend reversal, e.g. due to a macro shock, could drive a material unwind of positioning."

    Hot Money

    Systematic selling tends to have an outsized impact these days given weaker liquidity.

    JPMorgan quant strategist Marko Kolanovic has highlighted the relationship between trading in S&P 500 futures and the VIX. As the volatility gauge rises, the number of equity contracts that an investor can expect to trade without moving the market diminishes at an exponential rate.

    Increased demand for calls from investors playing rally catch-up could also cause risks. Dealers that are "short gamma" from these trades would be forced to sell in a downturn, exacerbating losses, according to Goldman.

    The good news: Exchange-traded products that contributed last year to ebbs and flows in implied volatility have gone bust. And institutional sellers of options -- who typically don't vanish in the grip of unrest -- are on the rise.

    But in these complex markets, nothing can be taken for granted.

    Just a modest two-day S&P 500 decline this week, for example, spurred "demand for 'tail risk' hedges to jump precipitously," Charlie McElligott, Nomura strategist, wrote in an email -- a sign of febrile sentiment in the market calm.

    — With assistance by Joanna Ossing



    Fabrizio 

    Commenti

    Post popolari in questo blog

    Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

    After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial

    3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

    3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict

    What Will Stocks Do When “Consensual Hallucination” Ends?

    The phenomenon works – until it doesn't. What's astonishing is how long it works. There is a phenomenon in stock markets, in bond markets, in housing markets, in cryptocurrency markets, and in other markets where people attempt to get rich. It's when everyone is pulling in the same direction, energetically hyping everything, willfully swallowing any propaganda or outright falsehood, and not just nibbling on it, but swallowing it hook, line, and sinker, and strenuously avoiding exposure to any fundamental reality. For only one reason: to make more money. People do it because it works. Trading algos are written to replicate it, because it works. It works on the simple principle: If everyone believes stocks will go up, no matter what the current price or the current situation, or current fundamental data, then stocks will go up. They will go up because there is a lot of buying pressure because everyone believes that everyone believes that prices will go up, and so they bid up