Passa ai contenuti principali

Will We Revisit The Lows? The Answer - Is It 1987 Or 1929

Two weeks ago, on quad-witch Friday March 20 which (so far) marked the lows of the coronavirus crisis, when US stocks plunged to levels not seen since late 2016, we showed a staggering chart from BofA putting the crash of 2020 in its historic context: in less than a month, the US stock market has crashed faster than both the Great Depression and Black Monday, and in terms of the total drawdown, the crash of 2020 is now worse than 1929 and is fast approaching 1987.

And while we have shown that the initial drop of the current crisis was more violent and rapid than the first leg of either the Black Monday crash or the Great Depression, the far more relevant question asked by traders, is what happens next if we use the 1987 and 1929 benchmarks as a reference. Will we "retest", or was March 20 the low, something which Morgan Stanley says is "the number one question we continue to discuss with clients", the same "number one" question that Goldman's clients were asking a week ago.

To answer that question we show Morgan Stanley's updates to these charts as they both remain remarkably on track for one of these episodes to play out.

Banks Will Go Through 'Earnings Hell,' Dimon May Provide Lift, Mayo Says

In other words, if we are now re-living 1987, then a retest of the lows is imminent at which point the last of the bulls will be cleared out, leading to more near-term pain but also a faster recovery.

Alternatively, if 2020 "is" 1929, then prepare for a lengthy period of pain as stocks struggle for the next decade, with the silver lining that at least they won't drop below the late-March lows.

But, be careful what you wish for as that 1929 'no retest' ended very, very badly...

What does Morgan Stanley think? The bank, which as we noted on Sunday has now become one of Wall Street's most prominent bulls in a dramatic almost-overnight reversal in sentiment, is predictably cheerful, with Michael Wilson writing this morning that while the bank appreciates these analogs always break down at some point, "we stand by our view at the time of the first publication that even in the very bad outcome of the 1930s, there was an extraordinary and tradeable rally from those initial price lows (Exhibit 1)."

For what it's worth, Morgan Stanley notes that it does not think we will have full retest of the lows nor do we think this is the beginning of a depression" which is surprising to say the least for a bank whose economists not only expect GDP to crash 38% in Q2, but for the full GDP loss to be recovered only by the end of 2021.

Indeed, ignoring its own economic forecast, the Morgan Stanley equity strategy team says that "as we have discussed in prior notes, we think this is the end of a cyclical bear market that began 2 years ago in the context of a secular bull market that began in 2011."

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict

What Will Stocks Do When “Consensual Hallucination” Ends?

The phenomenon works – until it doesn't. What's astonishing is how long it works. There is a phenomenon in stock markets, in bond markets, in housing markets, in cryptocurrency markets, and in other markets where people attempt to get rich. It's when everyone is pulling in the same direction, energetically hyping everything, willfully swallowing any propaganda or outright falsehood, and not just nibbling on it, but swallowing it hook, line, and sinker, and strenuously avoiding exposure to any fundamental reality. For only one reason: to make more money. People do it because it works. Trading algos are written to replicate it, because it works. It works on the simple principle: If everyone believes stocks will go up, no matter what the current price or the current situation, or current fundamental data, then stocks will go up. They will go up because there is a lot of buying pressure because everyone believes that everyone believes that prices will go up, and so they bid up