Passa ai contenuti principali

UBS Chief Economist: There Is No Inflation, Consumers Are Just Imagining It


Yesterday we asked if it was time to start worrying about food inflation while discussing recent notes by both Goldman and SocGen's Albert Edwards, who highlighted the current burst in food inflation across the globe and especially emerging markets, pointing out troubling similarities to the period of soaring food inflation in late 2010 - sparked by QE2 - and which culminated with the Arab Spring which led to numerous governments being toppled across the MENA region.

In his conclusion, Edwards urged readers to "keep a very close eye as to whether we see a repeat of the 2010/11 surge in food prices" because "on the 10th anniversary of the start of the Arab Spring, and with poverty having already been made much worse by the pandemic, another food price bubble could well be the straw to break the very angry camel's back."

In this context it becomes immediately clear why the topic of inflation is as much about politics (and geopolitics) as it is about economics and capital markets (we will spare a discussion here of why the CPI is purposefully distorted to stay as low as possible), and according to many analysts the biggest risk for record stock prices is a burst higher in inflation.

It's also why so many establishment economists are desperate to convince both markets and consumers (and perhaps, themselves) that despite surging food, housing, education and healthcare costs (and stagnant wages)...

... deflation will dominate (we will have more to say on the topic of inflation in a subsequent report).

One such hot take comes this morning from UBS' chief economist Paul Donovan (who as a reminder was suspended by UBS over his "Chinese pigs" comment last year), who argues that there is no inflation and consumers are just imagining it.

We would spend more time analyzing his "analysis" but...well, we won't. His comments are below:

Reported consumer price inflation is low in the world's major economies. Consumers are not inclined to believe this. Consumers are likely to think that inflation is higher than is being reported.

Consumers are subject to frequency bias when thinking about inflation. Consumers remember the prices of things that they buy frequently, and forget the prices of things they buy occasionally. Consumers' views on inflation are driven by price changes for high frequency purchases.

This makes food prices very important in shaping consumers' view of what inflation is doing. Food has become even more important in inflation perceptions during the pandemic; consumers are spending more money than normal on food for home consumption. In almost every major economy, food price inflation is significantly faster than overall inflation.

In the US, food price inflation is almost 2.5% faster than overall consumer price inflation. In the major EU economies the difference is 1.7% to 2.2%. In Korea the difference is 6.6%. Only the UK and China have food inflation below the headline rate.

While investors and policy makers worry that inflation is too low, consumers in many countries are likely to believe that their standard of living is being hurt by an inflation rate that is too high

Is he right that there is no inflation and it is just a mass psychosis among ordinary consumers that prices are going up (just make sure to ignore the above chart). We are confident that readers will be cool, calm and collected when responding to this latest example of Wall Street "research."

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict

What Will Stocks Do When “Consensual Hallucination” Ends?

The phenomenon works – until it doesn't. What's astonishing is how long it works. There is a phenomenon in stock markets, in bond markets, in housing markets, in cryptocurrency markets, and in other markets where people attempt to get rich. It's when everyone is pulling in the same direction, energetically hyping everything, willfully swallowing any propaganda or outright falsehood, and not just nibbling on it, but swallowing it hook, line, and sinker, and strenuously avoiding exposure to any fundamental reality. For only one reason: to make more money. People do it because it works. Trading algos are written to replicate it, because it works. It works on the simple principle: If everyone believes stocks will go up, no matter what the current price or the current situation, or current fundamental data, then stocks will go up. They will go up because there is a lot of buying pressure because everyone believes that everyone believes that prices will go up, and so they bid up