Passa ai contenuti principali

Banks Warn BTFD No Longer Works As Retail Investors Fade The YOLO

Over the weekend, Morgan Stanley's chief equity strategist Michael Wilson spooked some of the most vocal market propagandists when he pointed out the patently obvious, that tapering is in fact tightening, but also made a troubling observation for the market bulls: as Wilson put it, "the most powerful offset to a material correction in the S&P 500 this year has been the extremely resilient buy-the-dip mentality among retail investors, a strategy that is now being challenged. After the Evergrande dip and rally, stocks have probed lower and taken out the prior lows, making this the first time that buying the dip hasn't worked, simultaneously violating important technical support."

Then, overnight, Bank of America - which has been just as bearish as Morgan Stanley for much of 2021, most recently warning that the market's growing fragility would lead to a 20% correction in stocks - echoed Wilson  in observing that "equity investors are losing confidence in Buy The Dip."

As BofA's derivative strategist Nitin Saksena writes, after suffering a "meaningful setbacks in recent weeks," the coast appears far from clear.

Summarizing the recent market moves, Saksena then notes that after the worst calendar month since Mar-20, the S&P 500's streak without a 5% pullback ended last Thursday (Sep 30) at 227 days. It was the longest streak since Feb-18 and the 4th longest in the last 50 years.

And consistent with his core thesis that stability breeds fragility, he points out that the two other longest streaks since the GFC culminated in severe risk-off episodes in Aug-15 and Feb-18.

Last Thursday also marked the second daily selloff of 3 standard deviations or more in just 7 trading days, only the 24th time since 1928 that the S&P experienced two or more 3-sigma shocks within 10 trading days.

This is notable because while isolated equity selloffs have traditionally signaled an opportunity to profitably buy the dip, BofA finds that history is less supportive of "buying after clustered shocks" and indeed, only in 3 out of the other 23 episodes (and only in 1 in the last 50 years: the North Korea nuclear missile scare of Aug 2017) did the S&P surpass the prior month's peak in the month following the second shock.

To be sure, while the magnitude of the recent weakness won't make the history books, the stats above carry important sentiment implications for such a momentum-driven market as this one. Most important - according to Bank of America which echoes what Morgan Stanley said - is the realization that buying the dip has failed to be profitable this time, which in turn "may lower investors' confidence in buying the next dip and helping resume the market's climb."

It's not just technicals, of course: BofA suggests that another key obstacle to fading investor confidence in BTFD is the Fed's hawkish turn to begin tapering as early as next month. Obviously, any hints of Fed tightening are daunting for a market so dependent on central bank support, but as BofA also notes, "the FOMC's self-stated lack of visibility about the economic outlook (and which has only worsened since June)...

.. further raises risks of a misstep ahead."

So are these increasingly bearish takes credible?

One look at stocks today, which are surging - as the Monday dip is clearly being bought - and one would be hard pressed to conclude that BTFD is no more. On the other hand, a signal which validates that TBFD may be in trouble comes from Susquehanna International which analyzed OCC data and found that retail traders - the market's most-avid dip buyers earlier this year - are showing further evidence that their famous YOLO, or "you only live once" appetite for risk is waning.

According to the trading house, after the S&P 500 spent just two weeks in the red in September, small-lot options traders - those buying 10 contracts or less at a time - spent just 43% of their total volume on bullish contracts, the lowest share so far this year. In fact, markets sold off further last week, small lots paid up for puts. The daily average premium that small-lot traders shelled out for protection jumped to $480 million, the most since May according to Options Clearing Corp. data. While the premium paid for rout protection is still below its January highs, it is rising as have failed to make new highs, signaling more expectations for even more losses...

... which paradoxically means more are hedged to a drop and will likely step in aggressively to... BTFD when the next correction happens. In fact, we may already be seen just that: while the daytrading crowd may be backing away from small lot calls, its participation in individual stocks and ETFs has held steady. Tech heavyweights like Apple and Nvidia were among the most bought assets on Fidelity's platform during Monday's slide, with individual investors also placing massive bets on the triple-leverage ProShares UltraPro QQQ ETF, betting on a sharp rebound. Looking at today's action, it will be another good day for retail traders.

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict

What Will Stocks Do When “Consensual Hallucination” Ends?

The phenomenon works – until it doesn't. What's astonishing is how long it works. There is a phenomenon in stock markets, in bond markets, in housing markets, in cryptocurrency markets, and in other markets where people attempt to get rich. It's when everyone is pulling in the same direction, energetically hyping everything, willfully swallowing any propaganda or outright falsehood, and not just nibbling on it, but swallowing it hook, line, and sinker, and strenuously avoiding exposure to any fundamental reality. For only one reason: to make more money. People do it because it works. Trading algos are written to replicate it, because it works. It works on the simple principle: If everyone believes stocks will go up, no matter what the current price or the current situation, or current fundamental data, then stocks will go up. They will go up because there is a lot of buying pressure because everyone believes that everyone believes that prices will go up, and so they bid up