Passa ai contenuti principali

"A Giant Policy Failure" - Trader Slams Draghi's QE Infinity Idiocy

It's finally official. QE Infinity is here, so announced today by Mario Draghi at his final press conference as the head of the ECB. Not only QE, but also joining Turkey and Denmark as the latest countries to cut rates this year. Just today and many more to come.

I've opined on the subject quite a bit on twitter already today, but what happened today deserves some additional points to be made, mainly because of the intellectual bankruptcy permeating our entire market structure.

Let's start with the main point:

It's the point critics of these policies have been predicting for years. Permanent intervention is needed to hold the construct up. These policies never went everywhere. Whatever inflation or growth targets were promised never materialized. Whatever promises of normalization were made never came to fruition. All lies and false promises.  Year after year central bankers have come out, made promises and projections only to push them further into the distance and kept pressing the dovish button. Mario Draghi being the worst offender.

But of course he didn't get booed out of the press conference. Draghi was free to bullshit his way through the press conference with flat out nonsense like this:

Really? Where?

Inflation expectations (the stated goal of his policies) have trended down ever since the financial crisis.

Let's add QE to the mix and whaddya got?

Nothing.

Growth? In what? GDP?

Trending down and like the US on an ever slowing path from cycle to cycle. That may not be Draghi's fault. Demographics, technology, a messy conglomeration of nations trying to operate a common union and currency. Nobody can blame Draghi for that. What one can blame Draghi for is the utter dishonesty of it all making claims that are simply not true.

Negative rates have not produced growth, more likely they have hindered growth. Check the European banking sector if you don't believe.

Heck, check the ECB's own GDP forecast for the next 3 years:

That's what you get with QE infinity and negative rate infinity. Nothing. 1% growth. Congrats.

So an outrageous statement to make. But worse than the statement: None of the reporters present challenged Draghi. He never got challenged by reporters during his tenure, just submissive note taking, moving onto the next question adding no value all the while seeing his promised not come to fruition.

And so Draghi leaves office with a perfect dovish score of 4.68 trillion Euro with a policy of QE infinity on the table for his successor Christine Lagarde to not only embrace but to double down on.

Why am I ranting and complaining about all this?

Well, for one, I don't like being lied to and a concerted effort of deception is what the entire central banking cabal is engaged in during every policy meeting and press conference as they keep dancing about a key truth: With a fragile global economy the world is one confidence sapping 10%-20% market correction away from triggering a global recession. Central banks know this. Preventing this is the prime directive. Everything else is noise.

And unaccountable to policy failure they keep doubling down on policies that have prompted record wealth inequality spurred not by growth in the larger economy but by growth in vast asset price inflation benefitting the very few:

Structural bears have of course warned against this for years. But of course central banks are doubling down again now that all their projections have turned out to be wrong. And bulls are once again counting on central banks to bail them out as all their projections have turned out the wrong. Yield implosion this year? Didn't see it coming. GDP growth projections? Too optimistic.

Earnings forecasts? All off:

Price target reductions as a result? Nah, Let's raise price targets. Why? Multiple expansion courtesy rate cuts, QE and intervention.

Look, anybody can be wrong. I've been wrong. Bulls were massively wrong in 2018 and frankly they are wrong again in 2019 for the reasons I outlined. But then say that you were wrong and say that you are entirely reliant on central bank intervention to bail out the overstated earnings forecasts. At least that would be honest.

And I repeat: No bull market without central bank intervention. And this is precisely what bulls are counting on, that the almost recession can be averted agin like in 2012 and 2016:

And what, precisely, prompted these "resets"? Central bank intervention. In 2012 it was the Fed's QE3, in 2016 it was the combined efforts of global central banks leading to $5.5 trillion in intervention. And now bulls are counting on these intervention programs to succeed again.

But of course there may be a problem or two:

First we're coming from rock bottom to start with which raises the unanswered efficacy question I keep wondering about?

Why efficacy? Because there's this thing called yield curves that is now re-soundly dismissed by many. There are no yield curve inversions in 2012 nor in 2016. But of course bulls want to dismiss yield curve inversions like everything else, so strong is the faith in central bank efficacy.

But ignore yield curve inversions at your own risk:

Corporate profitability has a lot of catching up to do. But then perhaps this market no longer needs corporate profitability I understand. We have QE infinity and permanent multiple expansion.

Come on. Get real. QE infinity will not produce growth and neither will more negative rates. At best they can hope for is prevent a major market sell off to trigger a confidence bust leading to a recession. But the jury on this remains out. All new highs over the past 18 months have been sold.  All highs have come on central bank promises. As we are making new highs on the heels of the ECB decision and perhaps the Fed next week the question of efficacy will reveal itself. Failure is not an option for central banks. Question is how much longer investors will be contented with being lied to.

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial...

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict ...

China Market extends fall on talks of less stimulus

Headline indices of the Mainland  China  equity market closed down for second straight day on Tuesday, 23 April 2019, as profit booking selloff continued after a flurry of comments from policymakers signaled they're less comfortable about adding stimulus. At closing bell, the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index declined 0.51%, or 16.45 points, to 3,198.59 The Shenzhen Composite Index, which tracks stocks on China's second exchange, fell 1.32%, or 23.05 points, to 1,728.86. The blue-chip CSI300 index shed 0.16%, or 6.60 points, to 4,019.01.  Top-ranking policymaking bodies including the Politburo, the State Council, the central  bank  and the  Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission  have all held meetings in the last two weeks.  China  should fine-tune monetary policy in a pre-emptive way based on economic growth and price changes, according to a top-level meeting reports chaired by  President  Xi Jinping.  Monetary po...