Passa ai contenuti principali

Howard Marks: "Is It The Fed's Job To Keep Market Dislocations At Bay Forever?"

Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree has emerged as the latest (billionaire) voice to criticize the Fed (after Carl Icahn did it earlier in the day) for cutting interest rates last month, according to an interview with Bloomberg TV. Marks believes that more monetary stimulus will simply boost asset prices further, which will just serve to widen the income inequality gap. To which, we and anyone can only respond: he is absolutely correct.

Sure, it's a relatively simple concept, but then again so is not racking up $22 trillion in debt and catalyzing debt bubbles that, depending on sector, are approaching or have already eclipsed levels seen before the 2008 Great Recession. 

Marks opens his latest memo to clients, dated July 26, asking, "...is it the Fed's job to sustain expansions and keep market dislocations at bay ad infinitum?"

With the bull market now passing a decade-long with record low unemployment, Marks says the economy simply doesn't need the Fed's help. He argues that the rate cut last week will make it harder for people with less savings, and also lenders, to earn decent returns.

Oaktree's Marks on Loans, Distressed Investing, Fed Policy


 

Marks said: "The process of lowering the rates causes assets to inflate. There will be more wealth piled up by the people who have assets and it'll be harder for people who just have a little bit of savings to make a return."

He continued: "We stimulate the economy when it's doing poorly and we want to wake it up from the doldrums. We generally don't stimulate the economy after ten good years. We usually accept that there will be an ebb and flow to the cycle and there might be a justified recession. We have the lowest employment rate in 50 years and you usually don't stimulate at those times."

"I don't think it should. I don't think the Fed's job is to make sure there's never a recession," he continued. "If I ran the Fed what I would do is when the economy is roaring, I would try to cool it off so there's not too much inflation. When it's really weak I'd try to stimulate it. In between, I'd leave it alone."

His timing for speaking out and blaming the Fed appears spot on. The likelihood of a US recession in the next year has risen to 35% in August from 31% previously. Trade tensions continue to fuel uncertainty and the yield curve appears to be forecasting that a recession is inevitable.

But the market has been strong enough that opportunities to find distressed investments are still slim. Marks says that capital markets continue to be supportive of companies that need rescue financing or refinancing. Oaktree's distressed fund was raised in 2015 and is now only about a third invested.

"The fact that we're roughly 30% invested after this time shows you that the going is slow in distressed. This is not the kind of climate in which good healthy companies with good businesses get into distress," Marks said. 

"There is some distress in areas like retail and energy, but these are industries with their ups and downs," he continued. 

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial...

Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire - Bloomberg

Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-06/charting-the-world-economy-the-u-s-jobs-market-is-on-fire Charting the World Economy: The U.S. Jobs Market Is On Fire Zoe Schneeweiss Explore what's moving the global economy in the new season of the Stephanomics podcast. Subscribe via  Apple Podcast , Spotify or  Pocket Cast . The last U.S. payrolls report of the decade was a doozy, beating expectations and doing its bit to keep the consumer in good health heading into 2020. That's good news given the various pressures still weighing on global growth. Here's some of the charts that appeared on Bloomberg this week, offering a pictorial insight into the latest developments in the global economy. U.S. Advertisement Scroll to continue with content ...

The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time | Seeking Alpha

The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time | Seeking Alpha The Inverted Yield Curve: Why It Will Not Lead To A Recession This Time Apr. 23, 2019 8:41 AM ET Historically, an inverted yield curve has invariably led to a recession. We are currently experiencing an inverted yield curve. We have two reasons for the current inverted yield curve: the central banks irrationally raising short-term interest rates and investors expect a recession because of the extended boom period. The two reasons are not enough to lead to a recession, and other structural changes in the economy are pointing to a boom rather than a recession. Investors can capitalize on the current situation if they believe that the inverted yield cure would not lead to a recession. Summary and Paper Thesis Although an inverted yield curve led to a recession almost without exception in the last 50 years within a relatively short period of time after the inversion happened, this pap...