Passa ai contenuti principali

Howard Marks: "Is It The Fed's Job To Keep Market Dislocations At Bay Forever?"

Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree has emerged as the latest (billionaire) voice to criticize the Fed (after Carl Icahn did it earlier in the day) for cutting interest rates last month, according to an interview with Bloomberg TV. Marks believes that more monetary stimulus will simply boost asset prices further, which will just serve to widen the income inequality gap. To which, we and anyone can only respond: he is absolutely correct.

Sure, it's a relatively simple concept, but then again so is not racking up $22 trillion in debt and catalyzing debt bubbles that, depending on sector, are approaching or have already eclipsed levels seen before the 2008 Great Recession. 

Marks opens his latest memo to clients, dated July 26, asking, "...is it the Fed's job to sustain expansions and keep market dislocations at bay ad infinitum?"

With the bull market now passing a decade-long with record low unemployment, Marks says the economy simply doesn't need the Fed's help. He argues that the rate cut last week will make it harder for people with less savings, and also lenders, to earn decent returns.

Oaktree's Marks on Loans, Distressed Investing, Fed Policy


 

Marks said: "The process of lowering the rates causes assets to inflate. There will be more wealth piled up by the people who have assets and it'll be harder for people who just have a little bit of savings to make a return."

He continued: "We stimulate the economy when it's doing poorly and we want to wake it up from the doldrums. We generally don't stimulate the economy after ten good years. We usually accept that there will be an ebb and flow to the cycle and there might be a justified recession. We have the lowest employment rate in 50 years and you usually don't stimulate at those times."

"I don't think it should. I don't think the Fed's job is to make sure there's never a recession," he continued. "If I ran the Fed what I would do is when the economy is roaring, I would try to cool it off so there's not too much inflation. When it's really weak I'd try to stimulate it. In between, I'd leave it alone."

His timing for speaking out and blaming the Fed appears spot on. The likelihood of a US recession in the next year has risen to 35% in August from 31% previously. Trade tensions continue to fuel uncertainty and the yield curve appears to be forecasting that a recession is inevitable.

But the market has been strong enough that opportunities to find distressed investments are still slim. Marks says that capital markets continue to be supportive of companies that need rescue financing or refinancing. Oaktree's distressed fund was raised in 2015 and is now only about a third invested.

"The fact that we're roughly 30% invested after this time shows you that the going is slow in distressed. This is not the kind of climate in which good healthy companies with good businesses get into distress," Marks said. 

"There is some distress in areas like retail and energy, but these are industries with their ups and downs," he continued. 

Commenti

Post popolari in questo blog

Fwd: The Looming Bank Collapse The U.S. financial system could be on the cusp of calamity. This time, we might not be able to save it.

After months  of living with the coronavirus pandemic, American citizens are well aware of the toll it has taken on the economy: broken supply chains, record unemployment, failing small businesses. All of these factors are serious and could mire the United States in a deep, prolonged recession. But there's another threat to the economy, too. It lurks on the balance sheets of the big banks, and it could be cataclysmic. Imagine if, in addition to all the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic, you woke up one morning to find that the financial sector had collapsed. You may think that such a crisis is unlikely, with memories of the 2008 crash still so fresh. But banks learned few lessons from that calamity, and new laws intended to keep them from taking on too much risk have failed to do so. As a result, we could be on the precipice of another crash, one different from 2008 less in kind than in degree. This one could be worse. John Lawrence: Inside the 2008 financial crash The financial

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds

3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds https://www.forbes.com/ 3 Reasons Why Gold Will Outperform Equities And Bonds For centuries, gold has played a major role in human history and has become interwoven into the financial fabric of society. Beyond its investment following, gold has become synonymous with wealth. Historically, gold's early use cases revolved around money – a form of "medium of exchange". After the second world war however, several countries and their respective currencies, started to shift away from the gold standard and migrated towards a fiat currency system. Today, gold remains largely a "Store of Value", and due to its unique properties and large number of use cases, it has managed to distance itself from other asset classes in terms of correlation, demand / supply drivers, and investment purpose. Gold's idiosyncrasies function as a double-edged sword, as it is challenging to predict

What Will Stocks Do When “Consensual Hallucination” Ends?

The phenomenon works – until it doesn't. What's astonishing is how long it works. There is a phenomenon in stock markets, in bond markets, in housing markets, in cryptocurrency markets, and in other markets where people attempt to get rich. It's when everyone is pulling in the same direction, energetically hyping everything, willfully swallowing any propaganda or outright falsehood, and not just nibbling on it, but swallowing it hook, line, and sinker, and strenuously avoiding exposure to any fundamental reality. For only one reason: to make more money. People do it because it works. Trading algos are written to replicate it, because it works. It works on the simple principle: If everyone believes stocks will go up, no matter what the current price or the current situation, or current fundamental data, then stocks will go up. They will go up because there is a lot of buying pressure because everyone believes that everyone believes that prices will go up, and so they bid up